Jurisprudential aspects of entering a home without a warrant: a comparative study between the Court of Justice of Santa Catarina and the Superior Court of Justice

Authors

  • Gustavo Sobczak Universidade do Contestado (UNC)
  • Paulo Silas Taporosky Filho Universidade do Contestado (UNC)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24302/acaddir.v6.5591

Keywords:

home invasion, court order, criminal proceedings, case law

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the issue of entry into a home by a police authority without a court order. Considering the possibilities of entry permitted by law, entering another person's home when there is no court order authorized to do so poses a separate problem, since there are specific criteria that must be applied by the police authority, otherwise the action will be considered unlawful and, consequently, the act null and void, with direct effects on the resulting legal proceedings. Considering that the Superior Courts have established some criteria that function as these guidelines, the question arises as to whether the Court of Justice of the state of Santa Catarina has applied these same criteria in its decisions, given that this inquiry is the research problem that drives this study. The conclusion was affirmative, despite the lack of a clear definition of when just cause is considered to justify the entry requested into a home by a police authority, which means that the recognition of a given police action in this sense as null and void is something case-by-case. The methodology used is an exploratory exploration of bibliographic review and jurisprudential research, guided by the methodological format by chance and convenience.

Author Biographies

  • Gustavo Sobczak, Universidade do Contestado (UNC)

    Acadêmico do curso de Direito da Universidade do Contestado (UNC). Campus Canoinhas. Santa Catarina. Brasil. 

  • Paulo Silas Taporosky Filho, Universidade do Contestado (UNC)

    Mestre em Direito (UNINTER); Especialista em Ciências Penais; Especialista em Direito Processual Penal; Especialista em Filosofia; Pós-graduando (lato sensu) em Teoria Psicanalítica; Bacharelando em Letras (Português); Professor de Processo Penal e Direito Penal (UNC e UNINTER); Advogado; Membro da Comissão de Prerrogativas da OAB/PR; Membro da Comissão de Assuntos Culturais da OAB/PR; Membro da Rede Brasileira de Direito e Literatura; Diretor de Relações Sociais e Acadêmico da Associação Paranaense dos Advogados Criminalistas (APACRIMI)

Published

2024-12-13

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

SOBCZAK, Gustavo; TAPOROSKY FILHO, Paulo Silas. Jurisprudential aspects of entering a home without a warrant: a comparative study between the Court of Justice of Santa Catarina and the Superior Court of Justice. Academia de Direito, [S. l.], v. 6, p. 3719–3739, 2024. DOI: 10.24302/acaddir.v6.5591. Disponível em: https://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/acaddir/article/view/5591. Acesso em: 9 may. 2025.